Why The UN Lies About Global Warming

Global warming or climate change or whatever they’re calling it this week is a fraud.
You see that pretty quickly, once you get past your awe of AUTHORITY and look at the evidence on your own

If you have the scientific chops to evaluate a few statistics and numbers.

Hell, that’s overstating the prerequisites.  You just need to be able to draw a line through a cluster of points.

Actually you don’t even have to do that.  All you have to do is look at a line somebody else drew and see that it makes sense.  For all the rest of it, some intrepid researchers and activists have already done all the work for you.

You just have to give them a listen and see how what they say stacks up against what you’re being TOLD.
But most people can’t do that.

They don’t have much confidence in their ability to evaluate competing scientific theories.

So they go with whoever has the biggest platform and the best public relations campaign going.

That’s always the government.  In some form or another.

But it’s all there. The fraudsters even admit it from time to time.

But you have to listen to them, and understand what they’re saying.

Like this broad, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change

That sounds pretty impressive, right? Like maybe she knows what she’s talking about?

Actually, like most of these UN climate big shots, she doesn’t even have a degree in anything remotely related to climate science.  In fact, like most of them she doesn’t even have a hard science math-related degree.

Executive secretary of U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change is a regular number cruncher, with her master’s degree in… SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY

But she’s out there fronting for the UN on climate change anyway.  OK. Check out what she had to say the other day:

Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism.

“This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution,” she said.

Referring to a new international treaty environmentalists hope will be adopted at the Paris climate change conference later this year, she added: “This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history.”

See, if the rest of the world develops, and everybody adopts the living standards of the west , there will be problems with resource exhaustion.

That’s what these people are really trying to stop.

But that assumes the continuing use of current outmoded technologies and processes, and the continuing repression of vastly more productive and economical new technologies that are currently locked up by governments.

You want to go further down this rabbit hole, you’re on your own. But once again, it’s all there. You just have to look for it.

The bottom line is that there are ways for us all to enjoy a higher standard of living without exhausting resources.

But there are people who don’t want that to happen.

If you’re under 50 or have children you might want to think about the implications of that.
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s